I guess its not for you then because what I noticed with Toyota is that most of their small SUV`s are simple unless you buy into a special trim so considering that the CH-R is perfect for who it targets.The C-HR is certainly different from what you usually see these days, but the rear passenger area is said to be pretty dark and if its performance doesn't make up for the areas that it fails in, I have no interest in it.
I like winter sports and snowboards/skis along with other necessary equipment doesn't always fit in a trunk. Camping gear takes up a lot of space as well and if I plan to do other activities, that's more gear to pack. The Eclipse Cross looks like a sturdy and comfortable vehicle with ample space.
True but its hard to ignore the elephant in the room which is Toyota especially when models like the Highlander are sold globally and can be said to compete with the Eclipse Cross. But it won't just be reliability but historical value of the name and what people are comfortable with.....EC has zero historical value.They're essentially utility vehicles lacing in excitement, something that the Eclipse seem to have even though Mitsubishi isn't ranked as high on the reliability scale. But if that was what people based car purchases on then nobody would ever go for Jeep cars.
Its not but compared to all the other mitsu's on the road it is the most common, everything else is more of an option for people than a need. Everyone can find needs for sedans but the bigger you go the more you have to question it.The Lancer is still not all too common around my area and rarely seen. Perhaps because of the compact looks in times of a SUV and crossover boom. The Eclipse could take the Lancer's position and spearhead the Mitsubishi brand.
